Re: Program instantiation (was: Re: Translucent storage: design, pros, and cons
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Organization | The EROS Group, LLC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 18:48 +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > > (1) is infeasible in a system where the instantiating party does not > > have access to the capabilities that the program will require. One > > purpose of the constructor mechanism is to allow (e.g.) an instantiated > > password agent to have access to the password database when I do not. > > ... and likely should not have. Yet, if the yield is running our of > client provided transparent storage, the client effectively has access > to the database. So, don't you want these types of services to run as > daemons? Absolutely not. I want to be able to safely polyinstantiate them, which is why I need client-provided storage to be opaque. -- Jonathan S. Shapiro, Ph.D. Managing Director The EROS Group, LLC +1 443 927 1719 x5100