Re: Program instantiation (was: Re: Translucent storage: design, pros, and cons

"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.l4
Organization The EROS Group, LLC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 18:48 +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > (1) is infeasible in a system where the instantiating party does not
> > have access to the capabilities that the program will require. One
> > purpose of the constructor mechanism is to allow (e.g.) an instantiated
> > password agent to have access to the password database when I do not.
> 
> ... and likely should not have.  Yet, if the yield is running our of
> client provided transparent storage, the client effectively has access
> to the database.  So, don't you want these types of services to run as
> daemons?

Absolutely not. I want to be able to safely polyinstantiate them, which
is why I need client-provided storage to be opaque.
-- 
Jonathan S. Shapiro, Ph.D.
Managing Director
The EROS Group, LLC
+1 443 927 1719 x5100
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.