Re: Hurd/L4 active?
Pierre THIERRY <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scribit Shams dies 14/04/2007 hora 14:38: > I read somewhere that instead of L4, Hurd could be using L4.Sec as the > microkernel? Both Coyotos and L4.sec could be used, it seems. > > rather an experimental/research subproject. > Why another subproject, why not just develop/experiment with the > existing Hurd? Because there are issues with the current Hurd that might not be possible to solve while keeping Mach as the µ-kernel, at least (IIUC, in terms of security and performance). > Btw who calls the shots at which microkernel Hurd is going to be using > and the development path for Hurd. Those who write the code. Quickly, Pierre -- [email protected] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGIL5Yxe13INnVDYoRArn8AKCFmLA4/Q9YJg+9snjQRubQxH6sUwCdFiz5 KMkM749C5YR3/kV09ykBjOo= =nLov -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----