Re: Broken dream of mine :(

Sam Mason <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.l4
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 05:19:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2009/9/22 Sam Mason <[email protected]>:
> > If somebody breaks in and installs some malicious code then I want it to
> > break in the most obvious way possible.  The admin then reinstalls the
> > system and only when everything has been brought back to normal will the
> > system will be allowed back into the network.
> 
> How do you actually check for malicious code?

The obvious way is just to say that if any part of the TCB is unknown
then it's treated as malicious.

> The drm scheme only needs to protect a particular key store and
> integrity of a single application - the media player. This may be
> feasible even on Linux.

I'm not sure if I care about DRM or key stores at all.  All I think I
want TPM for is to verify that my TCB is one that's considered good.

> On the other hand, making sure that none of your documents are
> randomly sent over the network or overwritten  is hard, you can do
> that with a shell script or similar on most systems.
> 
> If they were drm protected media files there is no harm to the
> provider of the drm content, they can be still accesses only with the
> right keys and the right system and player.

I'm not interested in any of that.  The case I'm thinking of is a
network of computers using potentially sensitive data/code and I want to
make sure they're only running the "correct" code and neither code or
data are going fall under the control of an attacker.

> Different goals often require different tools.

Indeed they do, and I think that TPM should be able to increase my
confidence in this.  I'm not sure how much this will actually help
though.

> Even considering these possible variables there is still much less to
> check than with a TPM chip. You can also obtain information on the
> construction of the flash chip so you should be aware of possible
> pitfalls in advance.
> 
> It is also more feasible to get a custom BIOS than it is to get a
> custom TPM chip.

Yup, I'm starting to get the feeling you're right.  TPM is a fun bit of
research, but it's so far removed from any practical application that I'm
struggling to justify it.

-- 
  Sam  http://samason.me.uk/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.