Re: sustainable development
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:26:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 03:15:34 schrieb [email protected]: > > The means they use is to provide a Pro version which offers improved > > performance by some changes which everyone could do himself in the > > sources. > > Err... I don't quite get it. So is it free software what they sell? Do > they provide the modified sources? Jupp - it's just that nobody takes the trouble of compiling those. All that "Pro Version" stuff is in my view just a very neat marketing stunt - and they make very good money from it. What it really brings: More connectsions (configuration change) and a bit more aggressive downloads (configuration change). Essentially they lessen a config restriction - but I could do that myself by building from SVN. Giving people prebuilt binaries and an automatic update service can be quite a nice deal. And the basic version gets people fixed on the product :) > > You won't be able to create a self-running money machine, though. > > Very few people manage to do that with proprietary software. So few in > fact that it's insiginifcant. I don't think it's even appropriate to > mention it in this context... It's just not true that people writing > proprietary software get richer than those writing free software. Maybe my view is bent by M$ - and Apple (proprietary GUI). These are the ones I mostly see as making big money (with products for regular people). Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkq5zYwACgkQMwdGm/6WxARBEQCgytPhp+hpNQrd9VlSJInOi0q+ mMgAoMgqTu9r62YqqJXwPobXKiI9qFEt =NoTW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----