Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme
Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:04:46 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4,gmane.lisp.guile.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN3veRcghZLnL_QHLb+oDYxOa0UqU8HdDPVQeDHu4m0xhoE_DQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 2 February 2013 18:19, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]> skribis: >> After bootstrapping my current pet project, > > So you already started? > “Any day now.” > I think there are really two approaches: one is to augment the Hurd with > Guile APIs and servers, and another one is to write a Scheme OS (like > Göran’s http://weinholt.se/nygos/). You’re taking the first one, right? Primarily the second, I think. Guile APIs for the Hurd will be constructed, but I plan to implement from the security kernel down in Scheme, the target environment having most of core servers and kernel running in a single VM process. How well that works in practice is anyones guess. > > For the Hurd, I’d start by writing some sort of a MiG in Scheme macros. > This should permit porting the servers without having a Scheme kernel, right? Regards