Re: Reviewing Hurd-on-L4 (and considering its future?)

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:49:00PM +0200, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Doesn't Fiasco.OC provide sufficient object capability support, or is the "OC" 
> labelling not accurate according to certain criteria? (I can envisage people 
> having differing ideas about capability systems.)
> 
> "Object-oriented capability system - Unified universal mechanism for naming, 
> authorization and communication control"
> 
> http://l4re.org/fiasco/features.html

Yeah I'm not too familiar with all L4 variants, but this one does seem
to provide object capabilities.

-- 
Richard Braun