Re: About merging the Hurd homepage and the Hurd wiki

Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.web.devel,gmane.os.hurd.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello!

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:25:07PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > But does anyone disagree in general with merging the Hurd wiki into the
> > Hurd homepage?
> 
> While I personally don't have any concern, at the time the Hurd web page was
> written to match the general style and policies of the gnu.org domain.
> 
> The style has changed by now.

Correct.  But then, I saw a number of other GNU projects' pages also no
longer strictly applying the main gnu.org style.  And thanks to the
wonders of CSS, we could align rather easily.


> I don't know how translations are handled today.  This is something one might
> want to check.

Our translated pages are -- apart from static documents -- totally
lacking behind.  I decided for myself that retaining the translated pages
is not worth it, save perhaps the really static ones, like ``Towards a
New Strategy of OS Design'' and equal calibres.  Also, there are already
plans and beginnings of the implementation for a translation framework
within the ikiwiki software, where the existing bits could be
incorporated as soon as that's deployed.


> I have not checked the policy in a long time.  There may be some concerns about
> external links (no linking to non-free software etc).

That is a valid point, yes.  That's one part of what I meant when I said
that ``the wiki's current appearance doesn't match up with the ``solid''
appearance of the Hurd homepage'' (the other part being layout,
cleanliness, etc.).

For example, we currently have instructions about (a) running the Hurd on
the non-free vmware,
<http://www.thomas.schwinge.homeip.net/hurd-wiki/hurd/running.html>.
Neal added (b) a bunch of links to scientific papers.  That's both not on
par with the ``Guidelines for GNU Web Site Volunteers'',
<http://www.gnu.org/server/standards/>, at least as I read them.  What to
do?  I'd certainly very much like to keep at least (b).


Regards,
 Thomas
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 191 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJEEcwgfzh735dTTURAgvdAJ4ruD0dRKzeA48YCh1ND9QufX4OQwCdF+++
o6ryvZ/Y3SsmCi81xdMiGAo=
=MtQT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.