[gnu-pl] wwwgnudiff - raport nr 410
Wojciech Kotwica <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:28:40 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.web.translators.polish |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- prev/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html Wed May 12 05:29:29 2004 +++ curr/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html Wed Nov 3 05:27:50 2004 @@ -1205,13 +1205,17 @@ any way you like, and there are no requirements about licensing that data to anyone. -<p> -However, when the interpreter is extended to provide "bindings" to +<p>However, when the interpreter is extended to provide "bindings" to other facilities (often, but not necessarily, libraries), the interpreted program is effectively linked to the facilities it uses -through these bindings. So if these facilities are released under the +through these bindings. So if these facilities are released under the GPL, the interpreted program that uses them must be released in a GPL-compatible way. The JNI or Java Native Interface is an example of -such a facility; libraries that are accessed in this way are linked -dynamically with the Java programs that call them.</p> +such a binding mechanism; libraries that are accessed in this way are +linked dynamically with the Java programs that call them. These +libraries are also linked with the interpreter. If the interpreter is +linked statically with these libraries, or if it is designed to <A +HREF="GPLPluginsInNF"> link dynamically with these specific +libraries</A>, then it too needs to be released in a GPL-compatible +way.</p> <p> Another similar and very common case is to provide libraries with the @@ -2259,5 +2263,5 @@ Updated: <!-- timestamp start --> -$Date: 2004/05/11 11:20:29 $ $Author: wkotwica $ +$Date: 2004/11/02 19:00:59 $ $Author: novalis $ <!-- timestamp end --> </p>