[gnu-pl] wwwgnudiff - raport nr 410

Wojciech Kotwica <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:28:40 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.web.translators.polish
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- prev/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html	Wed May 12 05:29:29 2004
+++ curr/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html	Wed Nov  3 05:27:50 2004
@@ -1205,13 +1205,17 @@
 any way you like, and there are no requirements about licensing that data
 to anyone.
-<p>
-However, when the interpreter is extended to provide "bindings" to
+<p>However, when the interpreter is extended to provide "bindings" to
 other facilities (often, but not necessarily, libraries), the
 interpreted program is effectively linked to the facilities it uses
-through these bindings.  So if these facilities are released under the
+through these bindings. So if these facilities are released under the
 GPL, the interpreted program that uses them must be released in a
 GPL-compatible way.  The JNI or Java Native Interface is an example of
-such a facility; libraries that are accessed in this way are linked
-dynamically with the Java programs that call them.</p>
+such a binding mechanism; libraries that are accessed in this way are
+linked dynamically with the Java programs that call them.  These
+libraries are also linked with the interpreter.  If the interpreter is
+linked statically with these libraries, or if it is designed to <A
+HREF="GPLPluginsInNF"> link dynamically with these specific
+libraries</A>, then it too needs to be released in a GPL-compatible
+way.</p>
 <p>
 Another similar and very common case is to provide libraries with the
@@ -2259,5 +2263,5 @@
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2004/05/11 11:20:29 $ $Author: wkotwica $
+$Date: 2004/11/02 19:00:59 $ $Author: novalis $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>