[gnu-pl] wwwgnudiff - raport nr 442

--- prev/www/philosophy/free-sw.html	Wed Nov 17 05:28:17 2004
+++ curr/www/philosophy/free-sw.html	Mon Dec 13 05:28:14 2004
@@ -94,5 +94,5 @@
 the central freedoms; rather it protects them.</p>
 <p>
-Thus, you may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you
+You may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you
 may have obtained copies at no charge.  But regardless of how you got
 your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the
@@ -105,5 +105,5 @@
 <p>
 Rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if they
-don't effectively block your freedom to release modified versions.
+don't substantively block your freedom to release modified versions.
 Rules that ``if you make the program available in this way, you must
 make it available in that way also'' can be acceptable too, on the
@@ -111,5 +111,6 @@
 whether to publish the program or not.)  It is also acceptable for the
 license to require that, if you have distributed a modified version
-and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.</p>
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one,
+or that you identify yourself on your modifications.</p>
 <p>
 In the GNU project, we use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">``copyleft''</a>
@@ -196,5 +197,5 @@
 term "free software" because, once you have heard it refers to freedom
 rather than price, <a href="free-software-for-freedom.html">it calls
-to mind freedom</a>.</p>
+to mind freedom</a>.  The word "open" never does that.</p>
 
 <hr />
@@ -292,5 +293,5 @@
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2004/11/17 00:47:22 $ $Author: chstoneliu $
+$Date: 2004/12/12 18:23:56 $ $Author: rms $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>