Re: port-vax/60478: releng testbed is busted on VAX
"Martin Husemann via gnats" <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:35:11 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following reply was made to PR port-vax/60478; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Martin Husemann <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: port-vax/60478: releng testbed is busted on VAX Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:34:12 +0200 On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 01:50:02AM +0000, Robert Elz via gnats wrote: > I'd still appreciate knowing if there is any difference at all between > the way anita is run on amd64 (and vax perhaps) and on i386 ? I think this is less an anita related question but more about the install medium used. AFAICT there are three ways an install medium gets into sysinst: - boot from the final medium (maybe after ffs resize) and run sysinst from installed userland (I think evbarm USB images are in this category) - boot a ramdisk kernel ( / on memory disk ) and run sysinst from the (crunched) binary inside that - boot a "normal" kernel with / on the ISO filesystem read-only, with a few tmpfs overlaying and some bizare scripts faking init and sysinst runing as the login shell. VAX and sparc64 CD/DVD images are in this category. There is also a variant (not available as stock install medium) where a special file system images is prepared to mount as / and the kernel is loaded from the qemu command line with some args pointing it at the boot device - but this should not make a difference to the ramdisk kernel from a process/shell point of view. So I guess the interesting part for you is to either look at a VAX install CD directly or check what is going on in src/distrib/vax/cdroms/installcd. Martin