Re: network outages
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:02:11 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.current |
|---|---|
| Organization | Planix, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At Sat, 21 Mar 2026 22:16:29 -0000 (UTC), [email protected] (Michael van Elst) wrote: Subject: Re: network outages > > [email protected] ("Greg A. Woods") writes: > > >Isn't the simplest to just make kern.sbmax the right size for the > >largest given {send,recv}buf_max value? > > It's a limit for all socket buffers, not just TCP. And other protocols > don't have their own "max" values to look at. I figured as much, but Surely it could be auto-tuned up if a net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max value would bump into it before reaching its own max, and definitely if a sendspace value exceeds it? It seems horrible for the network stack to fail to open a TCP connection if the tuning is wrong, and surely other protocols won't mind if it is bigger than they need. -- Greg A. Woods <[email protected]> Kelowna, BC +1 250 762-7675 RoboHack <[email protected]> Planix, Inc. <[email protected]> Avoncote Farms <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRuK6dmwVAucmRxuh9mfXG3eL/0fwUCab8jcwAKCRBmfXG3eL/0 f5A+AJ4516HYcoLn66vWm2XwDGU6LXjLxwCgpN83TcUG2VrFrJxTNTybOTJFJmM= =jvZf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----