Re: driver(9)
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Mar 2026 14:50:35 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.current |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 11:09:47 +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> yet the next paragraph still mentions CFATTACH_DECL and declares sc_dev.
>
> Apply the following (which leaves an odd struct foo_softc declaration)?
>
> --- a/share/man/man9/driver.9
> +++ b/share/man/man9/driver.9
[...]
> @@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ structure for driver
> is defined with:
> .Bd -literal
> struct foo_softc {
> - device_t sc_dev; /* generic device info */
> /* device-specific state */
> };
> .Ed
You are a bit confused here. device_t is a _pointer_ to the struct
device, not inline struct device (as it used to be). You can check
cvs history for commits that (among other things) do:
- struct device foo_dev;
+ device_t foo_dev;
usually with something like "split softc and device_t" in the log
message.
-uwe