Re: gzimg hashes

On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 at 17:42:17 -0600, Brook Milligan wrote:
> I notice that the hashes generated for release files in the gzimg
> directory cover the uncompressed files, not the compressed files
> actually distributed.  This seems to be a mistake.
>=20
> The fix is clearly to reorder the hash generation relative to the
> compression, but I=E2=80=99m checking here to make sure I=E2=80=99m not m=
issing
> something.
>=20
> Cheers,
> Brook

Yes, that's one of the issues raised in PR 59195 (and its duplicate,
PR 60302), e.g.,
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2025/04/03/msg088095.html

(Since 59195 was already assigned to someone, I didn't look into
making any changes at the time, and soon forgot about it.)

Thanks,

Dave