Re: gzimg hashes

> On Jul 14, 2026, at 06:30, David H. Gutteridge <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>=20
> Looks like this is a parallelism issue, as I suspected. My example =
above
> is with "-j 8", where these checksums are spun up in parallel quite
> quickly. So something would have to deal with this.

Thanks for your comments.  I had already improved the script to use the =
build tools, but had not thought of mktemp.  I=E2=80=99ll fix that too.

I was initially surprised that it was not working for you, as I have =
been using this reliably for awhile, always for multiple files.  =
Parallelism problems make sense, though.  I=E2=80=99m not immediately =
sure what to do, but I=E2=80=99ll work on that.

Cheers,
Brook