Re: Linux emulation, binary software, cluster/grid and SMP
Mark Davies <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:19:41 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.cluster |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday 21 January 2006 11:30, George Georgalis wrote: > Well the advantage to having sge in pkgsrc is not only for this > version but future versions. Maybe math/R is a bigger deal for > that... many upgrades. I don't expect any major build issues with > either, so I may go with /usr/local installs just to be able > to support newer versions quicker. As far as math/R goes, thats a package that tends to keep up with the latest version reasonably well as we have some heavy R users here and I'm the maintainer of that package. > So I'm curious, if there is > something that makes each (most) sge pkgsrc versions difficult, or > is it just too east to tar xjf && cd && configure && make install, > so the pkgsrc lags behind? I think mostly its just someone having the interest to do it, and in fact if it is just as easy as "tar xjf && cd && configure && make install" its more likely that the pkgsrc version will be kept up-to-date. I think the large number of patches required for the 5.3 version may put people off looking at updating it but since 6 reportedly builds cleanly on NetBSD many of these patches can probably go away. I don't know, as since I asked someone else to look at updating the package I haven't looked closely myself - I'll chase them tuesday (monday's a holiday) and see where its at. cheers mark