Re: openssl 0.9.7 in NetBSD?
Love <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.crypto |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: >>> here are differences in terms of library symbols. it seems that the >>> biggest difference is rename of des_xx functions to DES_xx functions. >>> it has a large impact on existing codebase, i guess. we may need to >>> provide aliases or whatever. >> DES/des functions are not renames, but API changes. see des_old.h >> shipped with 0.9.7b. we may need to supply old functions to users, >> for backward compat's sake (or a shlib major bump). > > a split of libdes and libcrypto is clearly needed. > which functions have to be provided by libdes? but libdes and libcrypto will then provide the same symbols. There are applications that link agaist both libcrypto and libdes. Love
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 823 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD) iQIVAwUAPv6LnhZyDLTSep3UAQJdmQ/5AVQHwH8eCR5FWDUS4cuwxhOFc1uf69Gh xkUeS2YOH/aulkazEZZhRAHDlhp3mSRgSMHPnE5ID0Vby1FAVQAhpIY39WnPYFJN qK29RlDDCCrKW7AniG06dLzfg1yuAjRWJ+/bOGUP21+3v68uB9JjckQK0q5Ifge8 nQU/8JjgQY6I3VLVPj7ItycTaYeElmqds9rLi6ti+BaQpswXPH0ZretmSWrZ052P uUFsWeUlA+28FYn99B5+XVGQcTAzH9E09/r0ipOsH9Xo+EMIfQQojKBVy59HlI/N O4xiif6DU8VxwHDhEj61N95Dqy5MmP9wuqaQtBLc/2R0LWM1wgQs7X45jOx+DslB 1ic9K4wCzlkOfBiEQaJr2imNOZqXua/tNLwfQgReOvnbaWFm/PfhxcQXAnjbW0vv UyPDB1jjhg++510pgL2/wzvFHHTiC+I0v5XS/OsXXucbPgXDvJzuwEyreOQYo/9E qUn2ZDSxMRHyk3cJvQQbEruxIuQfANWtX/HvTddXHGnespBb9DWO1bMgN3LuuyXq gkXs8dPV6ranvZKeDqDwaU8qOhp5BnZNwO84rKxFci4HRYnVH1NJJFF0INmHdBMx p4RJk8M9Hfo7y+Y983uKurjTO8pGIqfVwcNQKxpXtLj2XxjMMmSRMNuK2+j7IWyd ZoJ3f85adcE= =HW2o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----