Re:
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.crypto |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "A" == A Priebe <[email protected]> writes: A> The problem shows up, when the IPsec SA reaches its soft limit A> (limits are by time, not by kBytes): As with other partners, a A> new SA (for each direction) is created and NOT used, until the A> hard limit is reached and the older SAs are deleted. In this Well, the peer is free to use any SA that you have negotiated. A> period I see our ESP packages leaving the racoon host (with SPI A> from the "old" SA), but don't get any ESP answer from the other A> side. I believe, that the other side simply ignores the ESP A> packages coming in with the "old" SPI. Unfortunately I have no A> posibility to carry out tests on the remote site :-( Did they send you a delete payload? The Cisco VPN3K is basically EOL. - -- ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Finger me for keys iQEVAwUBRDR/coCLcPvd0N1lAQLbTQf+N7L8KkG95y4ishAesaiJq1t1J8pdUijY CSnrOwcdKhE5vTVhqmCZgemHV01DZLAmyw2K89rq4XhI95VckAOsAjpyFQyEZ20m m5Lf7KEMQYWZXNmYLgGY7VWizFh8dEC0tSsBEqnR7tr0JcSGX3FlEF7EPXaeDa4W RvlHFzKHQ9Vr0SjdeOtCrIObS9PvUx8U5O27UMfNPeRJrT/NW3sZc67b4hpSJhNc JgzVQ7RAA6BZ5gRaa/9Zwmu/4XpBaZwgOmeDvfV8Vjyj8v4MAG7CFy6BnQPq28GR 5AmJnHXuGHIt/fMO046A2OYNNLZcSqp4/MLbSOgI18+Z16FsAlJjiQ== =Zkxi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----