Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.userlevel,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.crypto |
|---|---|
| Organization | Columbia University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:38:16 -0400 [email protected] (Nathan J. Williams) wrote: > "Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:38:12 -0400 > > Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I figure, it's NetBSD-current, so including OpenSSL-current is not > >> such a big deal. And I will try to keep up to date as there are > >> major changes in OpenSSL through 0.9.9 -- if in fact there are any. > >> > >> Opinions? > >> > > Makes sense to me -- it is, as you say, -current. > > I don't have any particular problem with Thor's plan, but this general > line of reasoning seems wrong; we'll want to release at some point, > and then it could become kind of annoying to ship a non-released > version of OpenSSL. > And the odds of us shipping before they do? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb