Re: Hardware-accelerated IPsec, anyone?
der Mouse <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:05:03 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.current,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.crypto |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> OpenSSL is the largest part of the problem: the OpenSSL team is > basically hostile to any attempts to even discuss fixing their > accelleration abstractions in a way which would make it possible to > use record ops or even accelerators which support HMAC directly! Maybe it's heretical of me, but this sounds to me as though we should be at least thinking about putting time and effort into finding ways to dump OpenSSL, then, rather than finding ways to work around it. FSVO "we" and "should", of course, this being an almost entirely volunteer project. (I can't help all that much; I don't have an OpenSSL replacement to offer. Closest I have is an ssh implementation that does not use OpenSSL at all. Could be a first step. Maybe.) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B