Re: cgd(4) ciphers
Jan Danielsson <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:37:29 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.security,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.crypto |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/30/13 9:22 AM, Taylor R Campbell wrote: [---] > The best two candidates that come to mind are Serpent, which fails > only (c) and (d), and Threefish, which seems like a good candidate. [---] > Thoughts? Yes, oh, yes. But personally, I think that having a good/working root-on-cgd solution should be a far higher priority. It's a little sad that we had cgd so early, but still don't have an easy/working solution for full harddrive encryption. /Jan