Re: cpu_intr_p() related question

On 01/09/13 23:42, Yann Sionneau wrote :
> Hello NetBSD hackers,
>
> I have read over there [0] that cpu_intr_p() should return true if 
> curcpu() is currently "in the context of a hardware interrupt".
>
> Does this mean that cpu_intr_p() should return true when CPU is in 
> exception handler (tlb miss handler, tlb fault handler, division by 
> zero etc) as well as in exception caused by an interruption? Or Should 
> it only return true for true interruption like UART or timer interrupt 
> and not for exception handlers not related to an interruption?
>
> I also had a look at this thread [1] but it did not provide me with 
> much information, except that I could just implement it as "return 
> false;", is it still true?
>
> Thanks :)
>
> [0] -- http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/smp/vmlocking.txt
> [1] -- 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/muc.lists.netbsd.current-users/AXJ65qh2Sdk
>
> Best regards,
As requested by Simon Burge, I am re-posting in plain-text (instead of 
html) this time, sorry for the inconvenience!

Best regards,

-- 
Yann Sionneau