Re: Small tip proposal for headless systems boot resiliency
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Dec 2013 16:45:35 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.embedded,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.userlevel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> The headless systems, or boxes that may be far away are a pain to get >> back online if stuck during the boot sequence... (embedded/headless >> do not have IP-KVM or remote control). >> >> >> * The point is : with a headless system you want it back online, >> really. Even if it needs maintenance, you need a ssh or whatever to >> get your hands dirty. So don't stop the boot sequence. If it's >> damaged beyond basic/rescue usability, it makes no difference >> anyway. JMNSHO: It is certainly much better to have the predictable known behavior of "no machine" than to have a machine whose behaviour is unkown and unknowable. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: | | Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com | | Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net | | Kernel Developer | | pgoyette at netbsd.org | -------------------------------------------------------------------------