Re: Small tip proposal for headless systems boot resiliency

Paul Goyette <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Dec 2013 16:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.embedded,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.userlevel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> The headless systems, or boxes that may be far away are a pain to get
>> back online if stuck during the boot sequence... (embedded/headless
>> do not have IP-KVM or remote control).
>>
>>
>> * The point is : with a headless system you want it back online,
>> really. Even if it needs maintenance, you need a ssh or whatever to
>> get your hands dirty. So don't stop the boot sequence. If it's
>> damaged beyond basic/rescue usability, it makes no difference
>> anyway.

JMNSHO:

It is certainly much better to have the predictable known behavior of 
"no machine" than to have a machine whose behaviour is unkown and 
unknowable.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:       |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com    |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer |                          | pgoyette at netbsd.org  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------