AnyBody worked with TSB43AB22 FireWire OHCI chip
"Gerald C. Simmons" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general,gmane.os.netbsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a Texas Instruments 400Mb Firewire controller. Was our OHCI driver checked out on the TSB43AB22? Maybe there is some subtle difference in the way NEC implemented IEEE1394a-2000 that is different than the TI chip. I don't see any PCI Firewire controllers listed in supported H/W on the website. OHCI or otherwise. Gerry Simmons [email protected] On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 Rishabh Kumar Goel wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a TSB43AB22 FireWire PCI controller card. I m trying get my FireWire > HDD workable on NetBSD. Though the ohci driver is fine with NEC OHCI > chip(72873) but it stucks with TSB43AB22 Card. > > ________Dmesg________ > sbpscsi0 at fwnode0fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 1, key 0x0, 0xf0010004, > 0x0 > > scsibus0 at sbpscsi0: 1 target, 1 lun per target > Called sbpscsi_scsipi_request > Got req_run_xfer > xs control: 0x000001c4, timeout: 10000 > opcode: 0x00 > 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 > Alloc'ing more orbs > fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 5, key 0x0, 0xf0010008, 0x0 > fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 1, key 0x0, 0xf001000c, 0x0 > fwohci_at_output: tcode 0x1, tlabel 0x37 hlen 16, dlen 8 > 0002dd10 ffc0ffff f0030000 00080000$ > 00000000 f0010008$ > fwohci_at_output: desc 24 > 02000010 00000000 00000000 00000000 0002dd10 ffc0ffff f0030000 00080000 > 103c0008 00535b30 00000000 00000000 > fwohci1: intmask=0x00000001: ReqTxComplete(0x8052) > fwohci1: intmask=0x00000030: RQPkt(0x8452) RSPkt(0x9451) > fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 5, key 0x0, 0xf0010010, 0x0 > fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 5, key 0x0, 0xf0010014, 0x0 > fwohci_event_thread: intmask 00000031 ReqTxComp RQPkt RSPkt > fwohci_at_done: desc 24 (3) > 02000010 00000000 00000000 00000000 0002dd10 ffc0ffff f0030000 00080000 > 103c0008 00535b30 00000000 8452c799 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 0, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 36 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 4, req 4096, res 4060, len 8, avail 32 > fwohci_buf_input: tcode=0xe, tlabel=0x0, hlen=12, dlen=0 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 12, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 24 > fwohci_phy_input: BusReset: 0x00010000 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 16, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 20 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 20, req 4096, res 4060, len 12, avail 16 > fwohci_buf_input: tcode=0x5, tlabel=0x16, hlen=16, dlen=0 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 32, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 4 > > sbp2_login_ans: (addr): (0x80053d4c) > fwohci_at_output: tcode 0x7, tlabel 0x16 hlen 16, dlen 32 > 00025970 ffc00020 00000000 00200000$ > 00000000 00000000 00000000 f001000c 90400000 00000010 00000000 f0010004$ > fwohci_at_output: desc 24 > 02000010 00000000 00000000 000031d6 00025970 ffc00020 00000000 00200000 > 103c0020 00cb3c00 00000000 00000000 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 36, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 0 > fwohci1: intmask=0x00000002: RespTxComplete(0x8051) > fwohci_buf_input: no input for 2 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1068, req 4096, res 3012, len 4, avail 16 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1072, req 4096, res 3012, len 8, avail 12 > fwohci_buf_input: tcode=0x2, tlabel=0x37, hlen=12, dlen=0 > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1080, req 4096, res 3012, len 4, avail 4 > fwohci_arrs_input: tcode 0x2, from 0xffc0, tlabel 0x37, rcode 0x0, hlen 12, > dle0 > fwohci_arrs_input: no listner > fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1084, req 4096, res 3012, len 4, avail 0 > fwohci_buf_input: no input for 3 > fwohci_event_thread: intmask 00000002 RespTxComp > fwohci_at_done: desc 24 (3) > 02000010 00000000 00000000 000031d6 00025970 ffc00020 00000000 00200000 > 103c0020 00cb3c00 00000000 84510000 > > sbp2_login_ans: (addr): (0x80053d4c) > > sbp2_free_orb:(addr):(0x8005575c) > Freeing orb at addr: 0x00000000f0010008 status_rec: 0x0 > sbpscsi_timeout > Called sbp2_abort > ________Dmesg________ > > I have seen some mails regarding this chip on linux mailing lists, but i m > unable to apply it with netbsd code? > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1458191 > -- > Regards, > Rishabh Kumar Goel > Software Engineer > SoCrates Software India Pvt. Ltd. > Bangalore > > Scanned by SecureSynergy VirusScreen Service. > For more information log on to : http://www.securesynergyonline.com or http://www.securesynergy.com >