Re: mbr can't open /boot on RaidFrame
Jeff Rizzo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marcin Jessa wrote: > On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:59:52 -0800 > Jeff Rizzo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Marcin Jessa wrote: >> >>> I've four aditional questions: >>> 1. Can raid partition have softdep on? >>> >>> >> yes >> > > Will this put the file system on RAID 1 disks in more risk if the computer gets > suddenly shot off (power loss, damaged power supply) ? > > People have varying levels of success with softdep. I haven't had a serious problem with it in quite some time, but others tell a different story. YMMV. >>> 2. Can I use FFSv2 instead of FFSv1 creating file systems on the raid devices? >>> >>> >> yes >> > > Why http://www.netbsd.org/guide/en/chap-rf.html#chap-rf-setup-filesystems > tells to use FFSv1 instead of FFSv2 ? Is FFSv2 experimental/unstable/slower/xyz than FFSv1 ? > FFSv2 has larger inodes, and can support larger filesystems. It also does some things faster (like newfs). It won't be compatible with some systems' boot ROMs that expect ffsv1, though. +j
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 367 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQ+uHlbOuUtxCgar5AQOlzgQAmAX6WKwl1XOLqqpepFu+ONk5E9LxsegE grVjSDiOPbMVbXUxRAZnXEdiYeht9NfV+3NSJY1syRJFFbF9LaWeOCJIESUumzAP v87AORJjBi5UkkZ1NDkKUiy1mdiYyhCQU3xrKtUJZC3mrtAw5PCq1M3Apaig3var /E+pUr4TlHU= =YGch -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----