Re: mounting OpenBSD filesystem
"Gary Thorpe" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: mounting OpenBSD filesystem >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:44:42 -0700 (PDT) > >I want to mount OpenBSD filesystems. I read that it is not supported. > >Is it supported? > >If not, can anyone share any suggestions on where to get started in trying >to be able to do this? > >This is what OpenBSD 3.1 sees: > ># using MBR partition 3: type A6 off 63 (0x3f) size 2491713 (0x260541) ># /dev/rwd0c: >type: ESDI >disk: ESDI/IDE disk >label: Conner Periphera >flags: >bytes/sector: 512 >sectors/track: 63 >tracks/cylinder: 16 >sectors/cylinder: 1008 >cylinders: 2477 >total sectors: 2496876 >rpm: 3600 >interleave: 1 >trackskew: 0 >cylinderskew: 0 >headswitch: 0 # microseconds >track-to-track seek: 0 # microseconds >drivedata: 0 > >16 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] > a: 2400000 63 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 0*- >2381*) > b: 96813 2400063 swap # (Cyl. 2381*- >2477*) > c: 2496876 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - >2477*) > >This is what NetBSD/i386 1.5.3 (rescue-small disk) sees: > ># /dev/rwd0d: >type: ESDI >disk: wd0s1 >label: >flags: >bytes/sector: 512 >sectors/track: 63 >tracks/cylinder: 255 >sectors/cylinder: 16065 >cylinders: 155 >total sectors: 2496816 >rpm: 3600 >interleave: 1 >trackskew: 0 >cylinderskew: 0 >headswitch: 0 # microseconds >track-to-track seek: 0 # microseconds >drivedata: 0 > >8 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs] > a: 65536 0 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - >4*) > b: 183712 65536 swap # (Cyl. 4*- >15*) > c: 2496816 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - >155*) > e: 61440 249248 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 15*- >19*) > f: 2186128 310688 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 19*- >155*) > >What is the preferred mailing list to discuss this? > >Thanks, > > Jeremy C. Reed > http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ You may want to indicate what arch this is for...my gues is i386? A related question: does netBSD actually support more than 8 partitions per disk? I had read that it had bumped this limit to 16, but is this only for 1.6's branch? Is this arch-specific also? Another question: if OpenBSD and NetBSD no longer use the same disklabel scheme (if I understand the output above), why don't they use formats which cannot be mistaken for each other? Was it *necessary* to make them incompatibe in the first place? _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com