Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/x86/x86
"Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) writes: > | Okay. > | > | Alternatively, it would be pretty easy to apply the diffs to those > | branches at the same time. I imagine that would serve the same > | purpose? (The changes are quite straightforward, and I could patch the > | three branches as well as the head without any trouble.) > > If you want to patch head and re-sync the branches (not patch the branches, > because this does not help much), get permission from the branch owners and > do it... I don't quite get the difference -- can you explain? I would have thought that if I performed the same transformation on both the trunk and the branch it would eliminate any incremental merge effort the change imposed. CVS doesn't keep track of change sets, after all... -- Perry E. Metzger [email protected]