Re: where are fsck return values documented?

On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 08:43:33PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
  | In article <[email protected]>,
  | Jeremy C. Reed <[email protected]> wrote:
  | >And where does 130 come from?
  | >
  | 
  | 128 + 2 [SIGNALLED + SIGINT], should not really be there, but fsck_msdos
  | does not catch signals :-( Someone should fix it :-)

Is it worth converting fsck(8) and fsck_*(8) to correctly
re-raise the default handler for SIGINT, as per
	http://www.cons.org/cracauer/sigint.html
?

I'm not sure how to detect that an application exited
with a signal from sh(1).


(I've converted various tools in the tree to using
raise_default_signal(3) (in libutil) so that they have
the signal behaviour as described in the URL above.)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFHwk6FpBhtmn8zJHIRAj5hAJ4xBnJ5aWD2Rbyrmx9nelkOo3TWBgCfVn8n
0tlzvSwne3I72qgqRASNp+M=
=jypT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----