Re: __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) for NetBSD?

>>> Then POSIX stuck their oar in and decided [syscall restart] ought
>>> to be an attribute of the signal; unfortunately, that doesn't work,
>> Doesn't work?  In what sense?  (It looks reasonable to me; I'm
>> wondering what I'm missing.)
> Well, consider select().  If your program has a select loop, [...].
> Then suppose you want to catch some signal.  (Common cases include
> SIGCHLD if you also have subprocesses, or SIGHUP if you're a daemon
> with config to reload.)  Recall that a signal handler, being an
> interrupt, is roughly speaking not allowed to do anything other than
> assign a value of type sig_atomic_t.

Not quite.  Rather, if it does do any other thing, it is off in
implementation-dependent weeds.  (For example, I have a program which
depends on close() working in a signal handler - by simply declaring
that I don't care about portability to systems where that doesn't work
the way the code expects.)

But I see your point, and it's a good one.  Thank you for explaining.

>>> so now it's sort of both and the real semantics are poorly
>>> specified.
>> Well, yeah, if POSIX didn't bother specifying exactly what they
>> meant, I can see that would be a problem.
> No, they did (AFAICR); it's just wrong.

Hm, that's not how I'd read "poorly specified".  I'd phrase that as
more "well specified but poorly chosen".  But that's a semantic niggle;
I agree with what you meant.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		[email protected]
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B