Re: netbsd-6 BETA2: raid starts after cgd.
David Brownlee <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:29:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general,gmane.os.netbsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGN_6pZVAGgC_v+W8efTT50SHiC3kY6E80BpmR5q4NZ6KSop8w@mail.gmail.com> |
On 1 July 2012 16:43, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28 June 2012 18:02, Jimmy Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I upgraded my old file server/backup server at home today. It runs cgd >> ontop of two disks running as a raid 1 array. It failed and entered >> single user with the error "cdconfig: action failed on /etc/cgd/cgd.conf >> line 1". >> >> My /etc/cgd/cgd.conf looks like this: >> >> cgd0 /etc/raid1a >> cgd1 /etc/raid0b >> >> cgd0 is where I store my files and cgd1 is my encrypted swap. >> >> I noticed that if I manually run "/etc/rc.d/cgd start" in single user >> and then do "mount -a" and "swapon -a" then everything mounts as it >> should. Due to this I concluded that this is probably because cgd is >> started before raidframe... >> >> Everything seems to run as expected if I add "# BEFORE: cgd" to >> /etc/rc.d/raidframe, which seems to support that my problem indeed is >> that cgd is started before raidframe. >> >> Starting raidframe before cgd makes more sense in my opinion, because >> I'd rather run a cgd ontop of a raid instead of a raid ontop 2 cgds. >> >> I'd like to finish off by saying that everything else with NetBSD 6 BETA2 >> has been smooth sailing, except for this little snag. > > I could see a use case either way, though I agree cgd-on-raid is > probably more common than raid-on-cgd. > > Would anyone have any objections to changing the default? Just a thought on this - have you tried setting up your raid to autoconfigure - that should work and not need the rc.d change (plus also be more robust as it no longer needs the raid config file)....