Re: NetBSD system package

Yuuki Enomoto <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:17:40 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.packages,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--s5ewcaufvccrckzp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:18:58PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 06:23:00AM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > > I am working on wip/basepkg that follows syspkgs project[1]. It can
> > > make base system packages as syspkg.
> >=20
> > > I gave an presentations in AsiaBSDCon 2017 and 2018[2]. I am using
> > > it and it seems to be work well. But it has still a few problems
> > > (dependency, naming of package, build server, etc).
> >=20
> > > Source code and usage are here[3]. I want to obtain feedback from
> > > users of basepkg.
> >=20
> > > Thank you!
> >=20
> > > [1] https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/syspkgs/
> > > [2] http://www.jp.netbsd.org/gallery/presentations/index.html
> > > [3] https://github.com/user340/basepkg
> >=20
> > > Yuuki Enomoto <[email protected]>
> >=20
> > FreeBSD is also trying something like this, originally intended to be i=
ncluded in FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, but that proved far too ambitious.
> >=20
> > Now FreeBSD is apparently trying to include pkgbase in FreeBSD 12.0, bu=
t activity on [email protected] emailing list is very infrequent.
> >=20
> > Would NetBSD users have the choice on whether or not to include native =
X in NetBSD system package, or to use pkgsrc modular-xorg?
> >=20
> > FreeBSD does not include Xorg in base system, only in ports (their pack=
age building and management system, comparable to pkgsrc for NetBSD).
>=20
> That isn't a "change of direction announcement", it's a project Yuuki
> Enomoto is working on.
>=20
> NetBSD/pkgsrc do not impose strong choices about where Xorg comes from.
> You can use Xorg from pkgsrc if you wish, and not install the X sets.
> I assume even with basepkg it is still possible.
>=20
> The current choice for NetBSD is to continue with base Xorg.
> Keep in mind that NetBSD ships a release with a binary & functional Xorg
> even for architectures like m68k, and to provide the same from pkgsrc
> would take large amounts of work.
> Any change will have to be for select architectures only.

basepkg is third party project, so it is not NetBSD official project.

Sorry for confusing you.

--=20
Yuuki Enomoto <[email protected]>

--s5ewcaufvccrckzp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE74SKjtHCqSq+6wkL4q5xR8IJCHcFAls2P4IACgkQ4q5xR8IJ
CHctBAgAqpGVuFETmrVzS+lmeTde/tD9n/gsB/l/lBTn7TshJp2IUvSr+tOzr9UP
kAkTfSIzQykWgkh8bU9ct0mdWyXDtGPAWV3gw9/t6QSkZgWN8+KlrI5BCXE5wZT/
JFoOfdErW4IJ4hSmlCYWYZtX7bOeRP2pInpf7a1NKioYjEQHZZAgURz6kMaOEJtn
CXZjTn5AZ4Ls+31mqmm1Fk2tRsNwrabJffvxjnmXh56kXZHJzPTokLn53f5JGLIu
9Ep8A/SMb78LE0oMt8prH69b8zb+n9lfRJxQ2hZ/CAvPh9EpBckmObjtjxT9hcNc
/e5XX+tFjGSpYNNUs8RbNB00MLjbvA==
=CuPQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--s5ewcaufvccrckzp--