Re: NetBSD system package
Yuuki Enomoto <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:17:40 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.packages,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--s5ewcaufvccrckzp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:18:58PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 06:23:00AM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > I am working on wip/basepkg that follows syspkgs project[1]. It can > > > make base system packages as syspkg. > >=20 > > > I gave an presentations in AsiaBSDCon 2017 and 2018[2]. I am using > > > it and it seems to be work well. But it has still a few problems > > > (dependency, naming of package, build server, etc). > >=20 > > > Source code and usage are here[3]. I want to obtain feedback from > > > users of basepkg. > >=20 > > > Thank you! > >=20 > > > [1] https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/syspkgs/ > > > [2] http://www.jp.netbsd.org/gallery/presentations/index.html > > > [3] https://github.com/user340/basepkg > >=20 > > > Yuuki Enomoto <[email protected]> > >=20 > > FreeBSD is also trying something like this, originally intended to be i= ncluded in FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, but that proved far too ambitious. > >=20 > > Now FreeBSD is apparently trying to include pkgbase in FreeBSD 12.0, bu= t activity on [email protected] emailing list is very infrequent. > >=20 > > Would NetBSD users have the choice on whether or not to include native = X in NetBSD system package, or to use pkgsrc modular-xorg? > >=20 > > FreeBSD does not include Xorg in base system, only in ports (their pack= age building and management system, comparable to pkgsrc for NetBSD). >=20 > That isn't a "change of direction announcement", it's a project Yuuki > Enomoto is working on. >=20 > NetBSD/pkgsrc do not impose strong choices about where Xorg comes from. > You can use Xorg from pkgsrc if you wish, and not install the X sets. > I assume even with basepkg it is still possible. >=20 > The current choice for NetBSD is to continue with base Xorg. > Keep in mind that NetBSD ships a release with a binary & functional Xorg > even for architectures like m68k, and to provide the same from pkgsrc > would take large amounts of work. > Any change will have to be for select architectures only. basepkg is third party project, so it is not NetBSD official project. Sorry for confusing you. --=20 Yuuki Enomoto <[email protected]> --s5ewcaufvccrckzp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE74SKjtHCqSq+6wkL4q5xR8IJCHcFAls2P4IACgkQ4q5xR8IJ CHctBAgAqpGVuFETmrVzS+lmeTde/tD9n/gsB/l/lBTn7TshJp2IUvSr+tOzr9UP kAkTfSIzQykWgkh8bU9ct0mdWyXDtGPAWV3gw9/t6QSkZgWN8+KlrI5BCXE5wZT/ JFoOfdErW4IJ4hSmlCYWYZtX7bOeRP2pInpf7a1NKioYjEQHZZAgURz6kMaOEJtn CXZjTn5AZ4Ls+31mqmm1Fk2tRsNwrabJffvxjnmXh56kXZHJzPTokLn53f5JGLIu 9Ep8A/SMb78LE0oMt8prH69b8zb+n9lfRJxQ2hZ/CAvPh9EpBckmObjtjxT9hcNc /e5XX+tFjGSpYNNUs8RbNB00MLjbvA== =CuPQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s5ewcaufvccrckzp--