Re: #define<TAB> in share/misc/style [was: CVS commit: src/share/misc]
John Hawkinson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There being insufficient clarity on the subject, I've backed this out and replaced it: /* * Macros are capitalized, parenthesized, and should avoid side-effects. - * Use one TAB between #define and the macro name; spacing after the macro - * name may be any whitespace, as appropriate. + * Spacing before and after the macro name may be any whitespace, though + * use of TABs should be consistent through a file. * If they are an inline expansion of a function, the function is defined * all in lowercase, the macro has the same name all in uppercase. * If the macro is an expression, wrap the expression in parenthesis. Greg A. Woods <[email protected]> wrote on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 at 18:07:37 -0500 in <[email protected]>: > I've never ever seen even the barest hint of reasonable rationale for > using a tab instead of a space beteen the "#define" and the macro name > which follows it. Well, I believe the rationales are a) consistency b) a desire to use TABs as a generalized seperator. b) doesn't hold a huge amount of weight, but it allows consistency with other kinds of syntaxes where spaces may not be the conceptual seperator. In any event, a few statistics are also instructive: Out of 33k #defines in the tree, 22k are #define<SP> and 10k are #define<TAB>. Moreover, out of 20k files that contain #defines, 14k use spaces and 6k use tabs. Personally, I have an irrational attachment to the use of tabs here, and would like to see a bit more inter-BSD consistency, but I don't think those reasons are strong enough here. --jhawk