Re: Enable UFS2, logging by default in sysinst

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Andrew Doran wrote:
> We already know that wapbl is more reliable than softdep, and if we wait as
> long as we did for UFS2 to say "yay verily this is good", we'd be shooting
> ourselves in the foot by not exploiting a feature that's both useful to
> users and useful to the project as a differentiator.

I suggest putting it in a sysinst menu:

For netbsd-5: softdep/wapbl/neither, default neither.
For current: wapbl yes/no, default yes.

--apb (Alan Barrett)