Re: sysinst split project - The Configuration File

Jan Danielsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation,gmane.os.netbsd.current
Organization La Cosa Nostra
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/14/09 19:51, Greg A. Woods wrote:
[---]
>> Anyway, I would have liked to see a "parameterized sysinst + native
>> packaging tool + system packages + automated netboot" installation system
>> for NetBSD.  It would have gone a long way towards acceptance of NetBSD
>> outside the "hardcore" user community.
> 
> Indeed -- we definitely agree on that topic!

   I've seen a few sysinst discussions in the past, but I haven't seen
anyone bring http://www.bsdinstaller.org/ up. (I'm not saying it's a
viable route for NetBSD, but I'm wondering if the people working on
sysinst have taken a look at it).

   To sum up the things which appeal to me:
   - Scriptable (in lua, as a matter of fact)
   - Separated frontend and backend
   - It's been around for a few years, and appears to be stable enough
to be adopted by other projects.

   As for problems, I assume it may be too "bloated" for some platforms.

-- 
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (NetBSD)

iEYEAREKAAYFAksmnfMACgkQm8buzhPXqO1I2wCfWq3Lh6cbR0OqANiThfB+KjpI
kngAn0WsDXSE5wCG3UmhNv3AcmsbvZC0
=rpvp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.