Re: sysinst split project - The Configuration File
Silas Silva <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation,gmane.os.netbsd.current |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:16:07PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote: > I am working on this. Myself and some other developers want Lua in > base. For different projects, actually. There is an email thread on > tech-userlevel about this. I just finished reading that thread. sysinst implemented in Lua looks like a great example for the chicken and egg problem. People asked for a list of uses? Here we get one. > The ones that will do the work will choose the tools, not the > bystanders... You are right :-) > > Couldn't sysinst import/export from/to both formats, human-readable > > (Lua script or another) and XML? That would solve the controversy, > > but it may be difficult to maintain support for two different > > standards. > > What would the gain be of having two configuration "languages"? I > guess it ould only add to complexity. IMO, there would be no gain. But, if libprop were used, it would take just some more lines of code to import/export them from/to Property Lists, which are XML. Ok, proplib(3) says proplib parser is not a read XML parser, but it is almost one. -- Silas Silva