Re: sysinst split project - The Configuration File

Silas Silva <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation,gmane.os.netbsd.current
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:16:07PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> I am working on this.  Myself and some other developers want Lua in
> base.  For different projects, actually.  There is an email thread on
> tech-userlevel about this.

I just finished reading that thread. sysinst implemented in Lua looks
like a great example for the chicken and egg problem. People asked for a
list of uses? Here we get one.

> The ones that will do the work will choose the tools, not the
> bystanders...

You are right :-)

> > Couldn't sysinst import/export from/to both formats, human-readable
> > (Lua script or another) and XML? That would solve the controversy,
> > but it may be difficult to maintain support for two different
> > standards.
> 
> What would the gain be of having two configuration "languages"?  I
> guess it ould only add to complexity.

IMO, there would be no gain. But, if libprop were used, it would take
just some more lines of code to import/export them from/to Property
Lists, which are XML.

Ok, proplib(3) says proplib parser is not a read XML parser, but it is
almost one.

-- 
Silas Silva
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.