Re: Lua for sysinst, next steps?

Am 21.11.13 11:14, schrieb Brett Lymn:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:53:11PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
>>
>> This is neither experimental (in production use since years)
> 
> That is good to know.
> 
>> nor a major
>> work, but something affecting a single binary only.
> 
> Right but it is the gateway binary to NetBSD - a first time user uses it
> to install the system.  We need to make sure it is in a fit state at
> release time.

I totally agree on this.

> 
>>  We will for sure
>> not create a branch for this, but continue our work on the -current branch.
>>
> 
> Please consider a branch if you think that what you are going to do may
> leave sysinst in an unusable state for extended periods.

Yes.  The intent, however, is not to break sysinst for even a short period.