Re: HTTPS trust anchors in sysinst
Mouse <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Aug 2023 01:08:47 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Here are the numbers for the slowest sparc I have in working condition > (a SparcStation LX), running -current. > [/tmp] martin@somnambulist > ./Falcon-impl-20211101/speed I finally made the falcon code build on the 1.4T/sparc SPARCstation-20s. One of them cpu0 at mainbus0: RT620/625 @ 125 MHz, on-chip FPU cpu0: 256K byte write-back, 64 bytes/line, sw flush: cache enabled produced these numbers time threshold = 2.0000 s kg = keygen, ek = expand private key, sd = sign (without expanded key) st = sign (with expanded key), vv = verify sdc, stc, vvc: like sd, st and vv, but with constant-time hash-to-point keygen in milliseconds, other values in microseconds degree kg(ms) ek(us) sd(us) sdc(us) st(us) stc(us) vv(us) vvc(us) 256: 3700.00 9043.82 30821.92 32537.31 19059.83 20818.18 4422.31 5783.78 512: 8680.00 19636.36 63939.39 65151.52 38793.10 41272.73 8803.42 11230.77 1024: 27990.00 41568.63 130000.00 135625.00 78064.52 80689.66 19272.73 22886.60 for what that may be worth. I find the similarities and differences between these and martin@'s LX numbers interesting. This was my principal screen-&-keyboard machine, so it was not otherwise idle. Based on a quick sample with top, I would estimate the speed tester was getting 65-75 percent of the CPU. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B