Re: /cdrom

Eric Haszlakiewicz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 12:56:15PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
>   
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
>>     
>>> I would prefer using /mnt/cdrom instead of creating another top-level
>>> directory. Especially as there might be more such mountpoints to be
>>> added (dvd, floppy).
>>>       
>> This would contradict hier(7), and my proposal does not focus on that.
>>     
>
> Ah, ok. What about introducing /media according to the FHS, then?
> It says: "Historically there have been a number of other different places
> used to mount removeable media such as /cdrom, /mnt or /mnt/cdrom.
> Placing the mount points for all removeable media directly in the root
> directory would potentially result in a large number of extra
> directories in /."
> (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#MEDIAMOUNTPOINT)
>
> Pavel
>   

Any reason not to setup an amd config for these directories?  ("too much 
more complicated than /etc/fstab"?)
If we want to make things convinient, "cd /cdrom" is certainly easier 
than "mount /cdrom; cd /cdrow; ...; umount /cdrom"

eric
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.