Re: lvm sysinst patch
Hubert Feyrer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.installation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
>> Is offering the menu item really worth the increase in space for the
>> ramdisk? If there's a deeper thought, then this should be reflected in the
>> install docs, at least ("If you intend to use LVM, do ...").
>>
>> Having LVM documented in the NetBSD Guide could go as a nice alternative
>> for this (Have a chapter "How to install a system with LVM enabled" in
>> the Guide, and the reference this in the install docs).
>
> imo, if we're going to offer a feature and have any desire for it to be
> widely used it should be obviously present in the "normal" way of installing
> a system.
> You seem to be arguing *against* making the use of lvm user friendly. Am
> I interpreting you correctly?
No, I agree with you.
- Hubert