Re: current/netbsd-10: panic() when MULTIPROCESSOR is disabled

> On Apr 24, 2024, at 3:54 PM, matthew green <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> "Jonathan A. Kollasch" writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:51:32PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
>>> I'm slimming down a GENERIC i386 kernel[1] for an embedded board[2], when i
>>> discovered that turning off MULTIPROCESSOR, leads to:
>> 
>> There's a reason it's in std.i386 and std.amd64 and not GENERIC.
>> Turning MULTIPROCESSOR off on x86 bare-metal hasn't been expected
>> to work for just under 16 years now.  Does it really save that much
>> space for you?
> 
> it worked for me not too long ago, and not too long before that,
> though it normally does take some code patching to compile.
> 
> this is the first time i've heard of it not working at all..

Yah, that really should be fixed.

-- thorpej