Re: config: conditional at clause (was: vio9p vs. GENERIC.local vs. XEN3_DOM[0U])
Martin Husemann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 01:38:56AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense for the XEN kernels to #include XEN.local
> rather than GENERIC.local?
Exactly. Every "generic" kernel should include its own ${name}.local,
like e.g. GENERIC64 and GENERIC64.local vs GENERIC and GENERIC.local
do on evbarm.
Including ${some_other_name}.local is a confusing (and probably just a
copy & pasto bug).
Maybe GENERIC should be split into a common part and both XEN* and GENERIC
should include that common part, then do their special things, and
at the end do the cinclude *.local for their "own" local part.
Martin