Re: enable KGDB causes the build failure

Valery Ushakov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 17:20:27 +0800, Rui-Xiang Guo wrote:

> The build.sh runs on amd64 10.0 for cross compilation of evbarm GENERIC.
> DDB, DDB_ONPANIC=1, DDB_HISTORY_SIZE=100 are commented out and KGDB is enabled.
> 
> --- db_interface.o ---
> /home/rxg/10.0/usr/src/sys/arch/arm/arm32/db_interface.c:77:5: error: conflicting type qualifiers for 'db_active'
>    77 | int db_active = 0;
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~
> In file included from /home/rxg/10.0/usr/src/sys/arch/arm/arm32/db_interface.c:59:
> /home/rxg/10.0/usr/src/sys/ddb/db_active.h:41:18: note: previous definition of 'db_active' was here
>    41 | static const int db_active __unused = 0;
>       |                  ^~~~~~~~~
> 
> *** Failed target: db_interface.o
> 
> Do I miss something?

KGDB w/out DDB is probably not well tested everywhere.  Other arches
either include db_interface.c only for ddb (e.g. i386), or, when they
include it for both, ifdef out the db_active definition (e.g. sh3)

-uwe
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.