Re: Possible garbage value return in IXL

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 02:04:07PM +0000, Emmanuel Nyarko wrote:
> So then I guess we will need to init rv to 0.

The ixl_other_intr() handler seems to hard code the assumption that the
interrupt is to be handled by it, unconditionally clears all enabled
interrupts, calls ixl_flush() etc.

This needs more fixing than just initializing rv = 0.

Maybe the handler is even correct and the interrupt can not come from
any other device, so always return 1 would be correct - but then it
needs a comment explaining why this is the case.

I wouldn't touch it and find someone who can actually test changes,
maybe file a PR instead and/or ping Yamaguchi-san.

Martin