Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections

Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.x86-64,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> writes:

> With the recent changes, specifying /onetbsd will only look for a
> kernel in /onetbsd and /onetbsd.gz (both being regular files);  it
> will not look in /onetbsd/kernel or /onetbsd/kernel.gz as might be
> expected.
>
> If one is accustomed to booting with the leading slash it could be
> disconcerting (or worse) to not having ingrained muscle-memory boot
> the old kernel as expected.

My $0.02 is that I had no idea that 'boot foo' would try to load
foo/kernel, and that I find this unintuitive and not really helpful.

Reading boot(8) on current amd64, I see that boot is specified to take
"filename" and there is no mention of directories.  The man page kind of
implies that filename must be the name of a file in the root directory.
There's no suggestion that it makes sense to have leading slash.
There's no suggestion that one can give a pathname rather than a
filename.

Thus I suspect I am missing something.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.