Re: tar x cpu bound

Edgar Fuß <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel
Message-ID <aCRi0G/[email protected]>
> You said nothing about the system you are running this on.  How many cores?
Opteron 4226, six cores.

> What kind of disks?
RAIDframe level 5 on five Samsung PM1643a 1,92TB SAS SSDs on a SAS9207-8i 
(mfii).
Varying SpSU on the RAID (that's why I'm doing this in the first place).

> Are they using MSI/MSIX to distribute interrupts to multiple CPUs?
Oops, no. Neither on -8 nor on -10.

> What file system and what mount options?
FFS with quotas (newfs -O 2 -q user -q group), varying block sizes (see above).

> Perhaps you should run your tests to extract to a tmpfs, to remove vagaries
> from hardware from the experiment and to establish a baseline.
Well, the original intent is to test various SpSU/fsbsize combinations on the 
test system before updating the NFS server with the SSDs.

EF> The second question is what the single number without a backtrace means.
CB> That is the number of time that the backtrace was sampled.
An empty backtrace?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.