Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections

On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 07:34:29AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2025, Greg Troxel wrote:
> >Paul Goyette <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >>>Yup, I think you're missing the fact that all of this relates to the
> >>>ratther new-ish KERNEL_DIR option, support for which was only recently
> >>>completed (by myself).  KERNEL_DIR is described briefly in options(4),
> >>>and it is noted in both CHANGES and UPDATING.
> >>
> >>Correction, KERNEL_DIR is described in mk.conf(5).  It is a build.sh
> >>option.
> >
> >Is how one interacts with it described in boot(8)?  It seems like it
> >should be.  (The build where I went to read that man page is from May
> >5.)
> 
> I am updating x86/boot(8) now.

x86/boot(8) now states:

  If the specified
  .Pa filename
  does not contain an embedded slash character, the boot loader will also
  try
  .Pa filename/kernel
  and
  .Pa filename/kernel.gz .

Is the emphasis on an *embedded* slash to be taken literally?  I.e. are
leading and trailing slashes considered embedded or not?  In the former
case, why specifically mention embedded and not just say "contains a slash
character?"

The code just checks if filename *contains* a slash.  I'm wondering what is
actually intended here.

--chris