Re: ALTQ modifications proposal

Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network
Message-ID <[email protected]>

> On 22 Jun 2025, at 2:54 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:19:14PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
>> 
>> If there really no useful setups which fq-codel could replace?
>> Including "I need to simulate packet loss and odd bandwidth behaviour
>> to stress my other systems"?
> 
> I use 'tc' at work to simulate WAN conditions when testing a number of
> Linux-based products.  To my knowledge, the "queueing disciplines" used for
> this purpose have nothing to do with fq-codel, and it can't replace them.
> 
Okay then for use case, i would leave it. The whole plan was to have HFSC + fq codel. 
one scheduler and one queuing. but then again, i think I will leave it and find another way out.

Emmanuel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.