Re: Re: RFC: fullfs — disk-full simulation filesystem

>> Perhaps randomized support, [...]
> I like the idea, [...]

> Should I still add shortcuts for turning the failure on/off or should
> those be replaced by setting random 0/1?

I'd hesitate to tell you what you should do.  But it seems to me that
it's worth having on/off as separate controls for two reasons: (1) it's
a more human-friendly interface and (2) it is reasonable to turn
something off, then back on, and expect the random-chance setting to be
the same as it was before turning it off.

Whether "off" is implemented as "chance = 0" under the hood (with the
previous setting saved elsewhere for turning back on), or as a separate
internal control, would then be an implementation issue.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		[email protected]
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B