Re: Which way for posix_spawn close-on-exec improvements?
Chris Hanson <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:52:21 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 16, 2026, at 1:45 AM, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 12:25:35AM -0700, Chris Hanson wrote: > >> I'd love to hear thoughts on it. Neither seems like it'd be >> particularly difficult to add. (Heck, we could have both if we wanted, >> they don't really conflict?) > > "Both" was my first gut reaction too. Both of them sound usefull. And posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np is supported on Solaris and Linux too, not just FreeBSD, and it’d probably be very straightforward to just port the FreeBSD code. Sounds like a plan! -- Chris