Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.

> On May 31, 2026, at 7:07 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The underlying hardware's often the same (CDC made the guts of plenty of
> DEC drives), SMD drives internally have no facility for sparing out sectors,
> and I wonder whether Sun did in fact do it.  However, I just Googled around
> for SunOS 3 source code and I see no evidence of a bad144 utility, though
> I did not dig through the kernel looking for driver support.

SunOS 3 certainly had a flag for "use DEC std 144" in the dk_info structure (<sun/dkio.h>).

-- thorpej