Re: uvm_swap compression patch
Takashi YAMAMOTO <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:54:00 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKDaYtB3D4nneZEsnP9KQ2hyUVtqMyLBGpih7L3CumCPhQx0VA@mail.gmail.com> |
hi, On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 4:04=E2=80=AFAM Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]>= wrote: > > Dear folks, > > as part of a compressed ram experiment I'd like to try, I've first cleane= d up > the current uvm swap support for I noticed that the support for encrypted= swap > became distributed and not logical anymore. In the attached patch I've > contracted the encrypted support into the /dev/drum device and removed it= from > the specific swap support and callbacks. with the cost of an extra allocation for the common case? (just a question) > I've tested it using read/write on /dev/drum and tested it for swapping o= n > amd64 using plain and encrypted forms. One point of discussion could be t= hat > writing to /dev/drum from userland could be allowed or not. In the curren= t > patch its allowed > > Any thouhts? I'd like to commit it. > > With regards, > Reinoud >